Fast Company InfoGraphic Review (3) — Education and Employment

[Part three of my four-part series taking a critical look at an infographic.]

This section uses a pie chart, pictogram, and numbers to tell a story.

Or does it?

A couple of weeks ago I decided to review an infographic published on The previous two installments are Economy and Children and Family

Education and Employment: Three graphics, three problems

The pie chart is fine — the big wedge begins at the top and moves clockwise, like we read (Left to right, top to bottom).

Click image to embiggen


  • The pictograph in the middle uses five of ten icons to illustrate 51.4% (AGAIN!)
  • The dark black ‘direct reports’ icons below the female manager confuse the information that the pictograph is trying to convey. The black icons Almost outweigh the orange women icons.
  • The unemployment numbers take a snapshot in time that is not defined. When exactly were those rates taken? Are they the average from the last six months? Year? Ten years?


  • Keep the pie chart.
  • Don’t use the pictograph. Use something else, like a pie chart, or, combine it with the other big, fat number above (51%).
  • For the unemployment rates, a great solution would be sparklines showing rates for both men and women over the last 10-20 years with a couple of labels showing current rates.

Next week I’ll cover the final section, Political Power


What do YOU think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s